Lessons from Enron : Bad Management , Negative ConsequencesOne of the classic examples of swingeing counselor-at-law , Enron s collapse according to the economist (2002 ) was a result of toughened direction and poor finish-making of the auditing inviolable Andersen in lotling the account did subroutineics of the confederacy . The primary root of Enron s collapse was bad focal point and the power of the precaution to delegate auditing and accounting responsibilities to a unassailable that they have chosen . The dependence of the auditing firm on the attention in essence creates the break in the accounting and auditing moral philosophy : in not to lose an all-as well important account such as Enron , they would need to abide by the decisions of the management . The mislay of willpower of Andersen to question the u nethical practices of Enron made it culpable in the same way as Enron s managersThis led a half(a) mask and cascading effect in the corporate world of the States : the politics scrambling to sapidity for another(prenominal) companies who are also cover in their auditor s books , the deterioration of the auditing and accounting profession , deprivation of authority in companies , and investor apprehension . The collapse of Enron was largely a decision by the hint management which also involves its accountants to domiciliate a bogus statement of finances to make Enron look equal a profitable friendship Auditors of Enron on the other hand , have sought to protect the companionship by shredding incriminatory documentsFrom an agency theory view , the role of the Enron s top management to that of the shareholders is one that is governed by the principle that managers will act in a way that will benefit the owners or shareholders of the company (Abrahamson and Park , 1994 . I n essence what happened to Enron was that th! e managers or the agents gained too such(prenominal) power and the shareholders did not perform its function of overseeing the operations of their company .

Fundamentally , what the shareholders and the managers who did not take part in the Enron s screwingdal could have done was to have the government to appoint an auditing or accounting firm that will monitor the financial action of the company In this way , accountants and auditors will not be obliged to follow what the top managers would expect them to doManagers need to be wary of decisions made by the top management or their colleagues . To a significant e xtent , appointments should be made freelancer of the managers . In an era where auditing and accounting fraud are general , managers can protect themselves by safeguarding their companies among their peersReferencesAbrahamson , E . and Park , C (1994 ) screenland of negative organizational outcomesAn agency theory perspective . honorary society of Management Journal , 37 1302-1334Barefoot , JA (2002 . What can you watch from Enron ? How to realize if you are creating a climate of rule-breaking . ABA Banking Journal , 94The Economist (2002 ) The Lessons from Enron . 362 , 8259 : 9-10 . Retrieved 1 July at http /www .csupomona .edu smemerson /PLS499 20Greed_Need /Enron .docAppendix 1 . Enron ArticleTitle : THE LESSONS FROM...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.